Saturday, February 16, 2013

The Prioress in the Canterbury Tales



Within the General Prologue of The Canterbury Tales Chaucer takes great pains to describe several facets of the Prioress that make her unusual as a member of the clergy, such as her attention to cleanliness. To a modern reader her mannerisms might not seem so unusual, but taken in the context of the time when the text was written it becomes evident that Chaucer is attempting to tell his reader that the Prioress, who is supposed to identify as a member of the clergy, is in fact taking great pains appear aristocratic.
One of the first clues Chaucer gives is the fact that the Prioress speaks French (line 124), which is a language usually spoken by the upper class (enotes.com). It is also noted that she speaks provincial French and not “Parisian” or aristocratic French, which is supposed to be a source of humor.  She also wears clothing that is unusual for a Nun, specifically her rosary made of coral beads with a pendant on the end that, when translated, reads “Love Conquers All” (line 158). This is unusual in that decorative rosaries, and decorative clothing in general, were commonly worn by the upper class or even the male clergy, but as a nun she would generally be expected to wear a plain rosary and strive for a simple life. Of course, it would also be expected for her rosary to have a crucifix on the end instead of a pendant (shmoop). It is worth note that many of the sources I looked at were at odds over whether the rosary was meant to really be a religious rosary, or just jewelry.
However, what is most telling are her mannerisms. Her dainty mannerisms (lines 128-138) are more at home in a nobleman’s court than a nunnery (sparknotes). Specifically, the eating habits the prioress portrays would be expected from noble ladies trying to attract a husband, which the Prioress obviously is not supposed to be doing (since she is a high-ranking nun it can be assumed she is not really husband-hunting) (sparknotes). However, her mannerisms do show that she is invested in how other people perceive her personally, perhaps above how she is perceived as a representative of her station or her religious order.   
It is obvious within the text that Chaucer is both pointing out and poking fun at some problems he sees within the church. However, there are characters in the story who are shown to be much closer to the ideal of a person of their station in the clergy, such as the Parson; so Chaucer also acknowledges that there are still good people within the church, and therefore that there is still hope left.

 Sources